Cloropleths vs Isarithmic: Voting within or without boundaries
There have been two major ways to understand populations and their territorial distribution. In one kind, typified by choropleth maps, the density or degree of a feature is mapped in pre-given political units.*
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5abd/b5abd34fc8ccda9008777546b89a572bdc09ea4d" alt="Cloropleths Map of the Presidential Vote 2008 Cloropleths Map of the Presidential Vote 2008"
As second kind of map, known as isarithmic mapping (…), shows change varying continiously over space.*
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10bdb/10bdb16b1a67f944b0bf51fd378ce0cc95bf0b49" alt="isarithmic map of the presidential vote 2008 isarithmic map of the presidential vote 2008"
Where chloropleths maps produce a sense of populations as contained within boundaries, isarithmic mapping emphasizes continual variation and gradual change without clear differentiations.*
References
- The Book: * Jeremy W. Crampton: Mapping: a critical introduction to cartography and GIS, Wiley and Blackwell, 2010, p. 149
- The Blog: More details about the process and the data behind these maps is available on David B. Sparks’ blog.
- The Video: Isarithmic History of the Two-Party Presidential Vote